The Chinese New Space capabilities are remarkable.

“U.S. Intel Confirms This Is China’s Secret Spaceplane (Updated). The Chinese spaceplane design is unsurprisingly very similar to the U.S. Space Force's history-making X-37B.” (TWZ)

The image of China's highly secretive miniature space shuttle shows how advanced China really is. In space technology. The remarkable thing is the large-size rocket stage. That makes it possible. To make fast maneuvers in large orbital areas. This makes that space plane ideal. To operate as an orbital anti-satellite fighter. The highly automated system is almost Similar to the X-37B space plane. 

This space shuttle can fix satellites or adjust their trajectories. In the first case, this system transports robots. That can fix the satellite. The same system could also be used to collect satellites. That system can drive malfunctioning satellites into the atmosphere.  Operators can use that shuttle. To capture secretive military satellites. But as we know, those miniature shuttles are multipurpose tools. The spacecraft is highly secretive. Secrecy tells us about military purposes. 

They can be used for recon missions. They can target opponent reconnaissance satellites. Miniature shuttles can transport miniature ELINT and image-intelligence satellites to the orbiter. Miniature satellites can act as a swarm. They can connect the data that their systems collect. The miniature satellite cloud can collect data from multiple positions. They can offer communication tools for larger, more powerful killer satellites. 

Those miniature spaceplanes can also operate as ASAT (Anti-Satellite) platforms. They can carry miniature killer satellites to space. Those miniature satellites can involve microwave or laser weapons. Miniature laser satellites can drill holes in the satellite. That. Can damage things like satellite antennas. In those cases, the system uses those miniature satellites as silent saboteurs. Their purpose is not to destroy satellites. Their purpose is to disturb them. 

Satellites like GPS play a vital role in modern warfare. There are two ways to disturb satellite navigation systems. The system. They can use jammers to disturb satellites' ability to communicate with ground devices. The system. They can also blow gas impulses. To. GPS satellites and try to change targeted satellites' altitude or their trajectories. That kind of sabotage can remain unseen. There is a possibility. That near those satellites are some EMP satellites. They can try to jam those targeted satellites. The power. Of those microwave systems. It determines their effect. The jammer can look like a solar storm. Microwave systems can keep a targeted satellite in pieces. 

“U.S. Intel Warns China’s Space-Based Directed Energy Weapons Could Soon Threaten Satellites Battlefield space is heating up as the DIA warns that China could use orbital directed energy weapons to take down satellites by the end of the decade.” (TWZ)

That denies debris from spreading along the trajectories. 

The simplest ASAT satellites use kinetic energy systems. Kinetic energy ASATs can use miniature satellites. They collide with targeted satellites. Another system can use bullets to destroy targets. ASAT systems must not have very powerful gun systems. If. The killer satellite travels opposite to its target. It can send a kill device with very high impact speed. The problem is that. Those impacts increase space junk. Another version. Is to use miniature satellites to touch the targeted satellite. And then drive that targeted satellite into the atmosphere. 

Laser systems are more lethal. They can destroy an entire satellite in seconds. Those systems can cut solar panels. Or. If its power is high enough. The thermal expansion can detonate the satellite’s shell. The system can input thermal energy to the target. Then another satellite releases very cold gas into that target’s trajectory. That decreases the satellite's temperature. Very fast. That breaks the satellite’s shell. 

The thing is that. Killer satellites are coming. They are required to fight against FOBS (Fractional Orbital Bombardment Systems). Normally, FOBS means a nuclear weapon that orbits the Earth. The miniature shuttle can act as a FOBS weapon. That means the shuttle can carry nuclear weapons in its cargo bay. That shuttle can act as a “super drone”. Or the miniature shuttle can release the hypersonic glider to the target. The problem is that. The FOBS and EMP weapons can orbit Earth for years. The EMP satellite can seem very innocent. They can look like regular communication or even commercial satellites. This means that those satellites can do regular missions. But. Inside them can be a nuclear weapon. 

When that satellite travels over a certain place. It. Can detonate its warhead. The satellite can detonate its weapon by using radar. Or LIDAR and camera images. That DSMAC (Digital Scene-Matching Area Correlation System.  Makes it possible for the satellite to find its target. When the satellite detonates the megaton-class nuclear weapon above a city area. There. Is no time to react. The EMP destroys electronics in a large area. That EMP can deny the use of communication systems. This weapon collapses defenses. This is why. ASAT weapons play a vital role. In. The military ecosystem. 

The purpose. Of. ASAT systems is to intercept satellites that play a vital role in the military. The satellites that control drone swarms can collect data from enemy territory. The drones collect data while they travel to their target. They send that data to those satellites. HQ can use that data to plan a follow-up strike. 

https://www.twz.com/news-features/u-s-intel-confirms-this-is-chinas-secret-spaceplane

https://www.twz.com/space/u-s-intel-warns-chinas-space-based-directed-energy-weapons-could-soon-threaten-satellites

MQ-9 Reapers get laser-guided rockets.

MQ-9 Reapers are now armed with small laser-guided rockets. That thing should give the drone air-to-air capability. In some visions, high-flying drones or stratospheric satellites can shoot down drones using small air-to-air missiles. Maybe those high-flying systems. Like. High-altitude airships can also use laser weapons to destroy targets that fly below them. Those small laser-guided rockets can also be dangerous against high-speed fighters. 

These kinds of systems are urgent. New types of drones that can wait in cargo containers can be transported near the target. Those containers can be activated remotely. And then the warning time. Against those kinds of attacks is very short. 

The drone is platform-free. So, that means that the attacker can even carry those systems to the attack distance. This means that remote-control applications. That doesn’t require satellites. Allows the operation of drones. Those are in containers on the ship. And the crew of those ships might not even know about them. 

The high-flying platforms can react very fast. The drone defence. Requires effective systems. That can shoot down drones with very short warning time. In some visions, the MQ-9 Reaper, or its nuclear-powered versions, can operate against Shahed-type drones. 

The nuclear battery can give those drones unlimited operational time. The  RTG can deliver electricity to electric engines. And that system can operate. For many years, in the atmosphere. The high-flying drone can also use laser-guided rockets against incoming large missiles. 

When the ship travels past the target. That operator, who can sit in Moscow or Tehran, can activate the drone swarm. The control system can use the standard HF/VHF communication. In those cases.  The ship’s own radio is equipped with a modem. And that makes it possible to operate those drones from ground stations. 

The HESA Shahed 136

The high-flying airships or drones can destroy those drones. But that requires. That. Those systems are operational over the territory. The operational range of the Shahed-136 drone is about 2000 kilometers. The drone can carry 50 kg conventional warheads, including thermobaric or high-explosive anti-tank. 

Those drones can cause damage. Even for large objects. The drone can also carry biological or chemical weapons. This drone is an easy target for defenders. If the defender sees it. But there is a possibility that some Shahed versions. Can use electric engines. 

Or. The piston-engine-electric engine hybrid. The system can switch to an electric engine. At an optimal distance to the target. This makes those drones silent. The electric engine decreases its infrared signature. And if the drone can use the electric engine. After it runs out of fuel. That increases its flight time. The drone. Which uses electric engines. Can be used. In a shorter distance. The drone is a fast-advancing system. 

There is a possibility that another, larger drone can carry. Smaller drones. To be used in the operational area. Even a small drone. It can cause serious damage. The 50 kg RDX causes a dangerous pressure wave to the targeted ship. 

Those drones can be autonomous underwater vehicles. AUVs. But they can also be surface systems. Like boats. The piston engine-operated Shahed-type drone can also. Pull, maybe, the jet engine version behind it. More modern versions of the drones. They can be an AI agent operating. This means that. Those drones can avoid enemy fire. It can have an afterburning turbojet. That makes it a hard target. Especially if it can change its speed. All the time.  

This means that the first drone can attack a target on its route. And the jet engine drone can attack a target over a longer distance. The electric engine drone can also operate underwater. And it can make. Dangerous holes in the hulls of submarines. The drone can slide to the harbor and then aim itself at the bottom of the ships. 

https://www.defenseone.com/defense-systems/2026/05/air-force-missiles-reaper-drones/413469/

https://www.twz.com/air/mq-9-reaper-slings-drone-killing-laser-guided-rockets-in-tests

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autonomous_underwater_vehicle

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HESA_Shahed_136

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radioisotope_thermoelectric_generator

A Chinese portable electromagnetic gun can be far more dangerous than anyone expected.

To be dangerous, the railgun must not reach hypersonic speed. The speed of a normal bullet is enough to make those systems dangerous. The railgun can be connected with the automatic launch system, which takes an image of the target. It measures the air pressure, wind, target’s distance, precise position, and speed. And then. The operator aims the gun, and the system shoots the ammunition automatically. The system. It can also use intelligent bullets that the laser point aims to target. 

The system takes an image of the target. And then the system transfers it in the bullet, which uses its wings to drive it into the target. This allows the shooter to shoot precisely behind visual obstacles. The railgun system can also shoot small drone helicopters that fly over enemy heads. And then those mini copters can shoot those targets by using bullets inside them. The system would be. A little bit like the CBU-97 Sensor Fused Weapon, but smaller. The 20-40 mm version of this system is possible. To shoot through the portable railgun or grenade launcher.

Portable railguns reach a very high rate of fire. That means that the system can act as a portable version of the minigun. But the electromagnetic launching system makes it more flexible than regular guns. And another thing is that those electromagnetic weapons are not jammed in the same way as normal guns. The EM gun doesn’t need gunpowder, and that’s why it can act in very wet conditions. The main problem. With those guns is the battery system. Those batteries are heavy. They are as easy to change as the magazine of the gun. The system doesn’t cause flash in the dark. To be dangerous, the gun must not send ammunition. 

CBU-97 Sensor Fused Weapon’s tactical diagram. The small-sized man-portable version of this weapon. It is maybe under development. 

With hypersonic speed. The system can adjust the speed of ammunition from high subsonic to high supersonic. The speed of 9 mm. A Parabellum bullet is enough to kill a person. The small-sized EM guns don’t cause explosive alarms. The system can accelerate ammunition by using an electric arc. And then Gauss's track accelerates the ammunition. This kind of system can shoot 1000-3000 rounds per minute. 

The small railguns can be mounted on the drones. And the lack of recoil makes them suitable for small drones. Small drones. They  can be equipped with centrifugal cannons. Centrifugal cannon. It is just a spinning plate. The problem is that. The muzzle velocity of centrifugal cannons is not as high as that of magnetic cannons. 

The system that includes both systems. Centrifugal and magnetic accelerators can give far higher muzzle velocity and rate of fire than centrifugal cannon or magnetic cannon alone. 

The rate of fire could rise far higher if Gauss’s track is connected to a centrifugal cannon. The centrifugal cannon is a spinning plate that can guide those rounds to Gauss’s track. The system can drop metal balls onto the spinning plate. And then the hole in the frame lets those metal balls travel into the magnetic accelerator. 

https://brobible.com/culture/article/china-handheld-electromagnetic-railgun/

https://interestingengineering.com/military/china-electromagnetic-cannon-tech-coil-gun

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CBU-97_Sensor_Fuzed_Weapon

Drones cause a requirement for new defense.

Israel plans to install laser weapons in its helicopters and aircraft. Those systems can be used to fight against the drone threat. The laser weapon does not require ammunition, and theoretically, its ammunition capacity is unlimited. The laser weapon. That hovers above the ground. In. A helicopter or aircraft can be used against low-flying drones, other aircraft, or incoming missiles. This means the jet fighter can destroy missiles that are shot at it. 

Laser and microwave beams are things. That. It can also be used against things like enemy electric supply or vehicles. In some visions, the jet fighter radars can be used to give high-power microwave impulses against their targets. This makes enemy fighters harder to operate. 

The laser systems. Those that are used against the drones can use AI-based technology to complete their missions. The laser system. It can use similar technology. That is used in laser-based bug traps. That kills things like flies from the room. The system that destroys drones. It uses a high-energy beam. Like 10-100 kW systems. 

The requirement for the new systems in drone defense. It is urgent. The drone, even if it doesn’t use AI, is. A very big threat. The AI-based systems make drones make evasion movements. But. In all cases, there is a danger that the defender runs out of ammunition. The defender uses $4-5 million Patriot missiles against drones. That costs about $20000-60000 per unit. The problem is those HESA Shahed drones. 

They can also carry chemical and biological warheads. Or maybe also armour penetration warheads. This means that the defender. It cannot let any of those drones pass the defense. The problem is that those drones can be launched thousands against targets. Those systems can be dangerous. Especially if they hit things like electric supply systems. 

https://www.defensenews.com/global/mideast-africa/2026/03/18/israel-to-mount-lasers-on-fighter-jets-and-helicopters/

https://www.defensenews.com/global/europe/2025/09/09/israels-rafael-touts-iron-beam-antimissile-lasers-at-dsei-fair/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_Beam

Are you ready for quantum apocalypse?

Every single encryption made by traditional binary computers is vulnerable to quantum computers. There are service providers who promise end-to-end encryption. That should resist quantum computer-based attacks.  But are those encryption systems really tested against quantum computer-based attacks? It is always possible to create systems that use extremely complex math for encryption. But things like artificial intelligence can read words.  

Straight from the image that the camera transmits from a keyboard. If those keyboards are visible to some hacked cameras. The AI follows. On. How a person moves fingers on the keyboard. And reads words from those films. This means that if we are not prepared for AI. That is dangerous.  Second, that things like a note. Is visible. It is enough for AI that it can read words written to it. 

The attacking system would, anyway, be quantum computer-morphing neural network-based systems. The quantum computer will generate binary numbers for the morphing neural network. 

Which makes. Attacks against systems that use traditional Riemann conjecture-based encryption algorithms. Still yet. A quantum computer cannot. Run things like AI-based software. The complicated software. It runs. On a group of traditional binary computer networks. Which we call a morphing neural network. In that system, the group of computers runs the programs and makes those attacks simultaneously. The system changes the attacking computer. 

All the time. Which. Makes it hard to deny the IP address of the attacking system. The system can share binary numbers between those computers. And that makes this kind of system dangerous. The morphing neural network can run data like a single computer. Or. It can share different missions to separate computers, which means the morphing neural network can operate. With multiple problems. At the same time. The problem with traditional encryption collapse is that. It can endanger things. Like crypto- and digicurrencies security.  

This means that. Somebody. Could create fake crypto- and digital currencies. Digital currency means a national currency that is shared in digital form. If digital form currency can be faked, that can cause the collapse of the economy. The encryption is also required in computer operating systems and program updates. If somebody can slip malicious software. In the computer update flow, this can cause very big problems. The fake update. It can make it possible to switch off computers. And that can have a destructive effect. In cybersecurity. 

Cyber is the new dimension in intelligence and military operations. Things like malware, computer viruses, and spyware are tools that can endanger many things.  In an assassination. Of the Iranian leader Khamenei, the key role was in the traffic surveillance cameras. Those cameras offered real-time information about Khamenei and his security council’s movements. This means that even innocent-looking systems. Like. Surveillance cameras in the next building can open a window for hackers and other attackers. The AI can sort very large data masses. 

And it can find things. Like reflections from glasses. There is a computer screen visible. The system. It can render the image so clear that the passwords are visible. The AI agents can search things like passwords on cellphone screens. They can recognize. If somebody visits. On homepages. That requires strong identification. The AI can see when a person fills the passphrase box. And then it can give access to the system. The AI is the next-generation threat. Maybe the hackers already have AI assistants. That can detect things like logging in to the protected homepages. The system can see things like passwords from the computer screen. Or they can watch. The way a person moves their hands on keyboards. 

https://www.fairedih.fi/en/2025/10/30/the-encryption-endgame-why-the-world-faces-a-quantum-reckoning/#:~:text=When%20quantum%20computers%20break%20current%20encryption%20%E2%80%94%20and,become%20obsolete.%20This%20threat%20has%20already%20spurred%20action.

What if we move? All our work to AI?

We can compare the threat that AI poses to society to the influence of slavery on the Roman Empire. Sometimes people say that slavery destroyed Roman civilization. When the Romans transferred all duties and work to slaves, they became weak and lazy. That caused a situation where, in the case. There, Rome was under threat; there were no people. With the ability to fight against the threat that came in the form of Attila. When Attila and his Huns robbed. 

The city of Rome, all glory was gone. People noticed that Rome was the only city on the map. And that caused loss of respect. The reason. The reason the Roman Empire lost was that. It didn’t create anything new. It always used the same tactics. That caused the situation. The enemies of Rome knew what the Romans would do next. And they knew how to react to that thing. In the same way. If we give all the work. Into the hands of robots. And learn to use only the answers that the AI gives. We are going into the same position. Where the Romans went when they turned lazy. We will face a situation where nobody does anything. People just give orders to the AI. And that thing makes everything for humans.

What is gained in quantity is lost in accuracy. Things like dictionary books. They involve lots of topics. But information about each topic is limited.  When we want deep knowledge about things like how to make a computer program, we need a more precise dictionary. We need a data source about programming, which means the source involves information about fewer topics, but it involves information on how to create something. 

There are two ways. To measure productivity. 

1) We can simply calculate the number of products. That is a quantitative way to determine effectiveness. This is the simplest way to determine effectiveness. We can calculate how many reports the worker. Or some other actor makes during the working day. This is the easiest way to determine effectiveness. The number of reports. It is a good way to measure. The effectiveness of a worker. But. Those reports can only be scratching the surface. They might be like some encyclopedia. There is a lot of information. Or lots of topics. But there are a few details about those things. We couldn’t make things. Like computer programs. Or building houses if we only have common encyclopedias. We need deeper knowledge. About things that we should make when we want to make those things. The encyclopedia involves. A lot of surface data. About many things. 

2) We can see the quality of the product. This means a qualitative way to determine effectiveness. Deep information and deep knowledge are the qualitative ways to determine effectiveness. But then. We face another problem. How to determine deep knowledge? How can we say? Does that report involve deep knowledge? We can determine. The qualitative way to determine effectiveness. In programming. As the number of lines that pass the tests. But in things like regular reports or novels, we must ask, what makes some texts more qualitative than others? Is it that somebody clicks the link? 

The problem is that the AI recycles information. It will not make anything new. The final part of the Roman decay was a situation. Where Romans who loved Greece and philosophy started to read only texts written by the Greek philosophers. They didn’t even try to create their own texts. Except for some different people, like Marcus Aurelius. Bu. If we deliver all our work to the AI. We are choosing a path that is not good. In that case. People just lie. At home. Maybe that thing seems easy. But what if we turn our lives. Too easy? What if we lose our skills to read and write? We can simply give orders to AI, and it generates texts for us. Maybe. Most of those texts please readers. But do they improve our skills? To write and produce texts? When we talk about things. 

Like giving an ability to think to the AI. We always forget a couple of things. First thing is that. The AI is a good tool. To follow things. Like stock marketing or a certain vehicle in traffic. The AI is the only thing that can sort and process large data masses. And then if we follow the orders that the AI gives. We deliver our decision to AI. That brings new and complicated questions. The complicated question is, what if we don’t follow the orders that AI gives? If we want to sort manually. 

The same data mass that an AI agent sorts in minutes. We would spend years in that process. We can make AI to create texts. And that makes us effective. But. There is a price. For that effective work. We give orders to AI that creates lots of documents. But that doesn’t mean that we must read a single one of them. We can say that the situation is similar if we ask lots of questions. And then nobody answers.  

President Trump talked about the weapon that the Delta Force used in Venezuela.

MH-60M

There was suspicion that the U.S. troops used some kind of acoustic system in Venezuela during the Maduro capture. The system was probably a combination of the electromagnetic and acoustic weapons. That could knock out electronics and Maduro’s guards. 

The symptoms that the Venezuelan troops got, like a bleeding nose, nausea, and loss of ability to operate, indicate a weapon that uses an infrasound and ultrasound combination. That combination causes nausea, and the person loses the ability to concentrate. That kind of system was used in South Africa during the apartheid government for prison interrogations. Whether the system is LRAD or non-targeted loudspeaker-based is not known. 

There is a possibility that the Delta Force used an acoustic system called “brain jammer”. That system uses acoustic waves. To fall people. To sleep. That kind of system. Makes it possible to complete raids on difficult targets. Those systems are also suitable for solving hostage situations. There is also a possibility to use acoustic waves for “Rapid Transition: Research indicates that falling asleep is not a slow, gradual process, but rather a sudden shift, or "tipping point," where the brain quickly transitions from a waking state to a sleep state.” Or, that’s one version of the acoustic wave use in special situations. 

The LRAD (Long-Range Acoustic Device) can be installed in a helicopter. Like the MH-6 "Little Bird" spotlight. That system can send highly accurate acoustic waves to the target. 

Above: Maybe the secretive weapon that was used in the Maduro case was based on this technology. MIT News

NY-Post Topics. 

Below:LRAD weaponized cone of sound.

LRAD weaponized cone of sound. (ResearchGate)

There is a possibility that the U.S. troops used those systems to disturb the Maduro guards' sleep. And that made the mission easier to complete. The electric shutdown tells. About some kind of electromagnetic system. So maybe. Those systems use a combination of radio, microwave, and acoustic systems. To knock out enemy guards, shut down communication, and alarm systems. Details of those systems are secretive. 

But acoustic systems can be deadlier than anybody expected. Along with stroboscopic light that is synchronized with EEG-alpha waves, that system can cause epileptic symptoms. Researchers also found the wave. That puts a person to sleep. A weapon system uses that noise. The targeted person simply sleeps in that moment. That opens the road for attackers. 

There is an interesting detail in the acoustic, subliminal systems. Those systems can be used to give orders to enemy troops. There are so many suicide cases in the Russian army, and sometimes it is suspected that Russians or their opponents can give commands to soldiers to commit suicide. If the system operator uses infrasound loudspeakers. It's possible. To incite an enemy or another targeted person. To make things that they don’t otherwise do. 

https://www.criticalts.com/articles/what-is-lrad-and-how-to-use-it/

https://news.mit.edu/2024/startup-elemind-helps-people-fall-asleep-0925

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41593-025-02091-1

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-63385-1

https://nypost.com/2026/01/24/us-news/trump-reveals-to-the-post-secret-discombobulator-weapon-was-crucial-to-venezuelan-raid-on-maduro/

https://www.researchgate.net/figure/LRAD-weaponized-cone-of-sound_fig1_347576544

https://www.twz.com/air/night-stalker-mh-6-little-birds-ability-to-appear-out-of-nowhere-highlighted-in-tanker-raid

https://www.twz.com/air/this-is-what-the-night-stalkers-mh-60m-direct-action-penetrator-brought-to-the-venezuelan-op

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long-range_acoustic_device

The USA used civilian-style aircraft against suspected narcotics smugglers.

 

The USA used civilian-style aircraft against suspected narcotics smugglers. There is no mention of whether that aircraft uses civilian markings. Or was it only civilian style, but used army markings? There is a possibility that the Pentagon tested the effectiveness of those weapons.

The system. The military used GBU-69s and AGM-176s. In those strikes. Says the Washington Post.

This means that if there were some P-8 Poseidons in that area, their mission was probably to detect a target. The AGM-176 Griffins and GBU-69 Small Glide Munitions are made for SOF purposes. Griffin is a lightweight, low-cost, multi-service air-launched weapon featuring GPS-aided inertial guidance and a semi-active laser seeker. GBU-69 utilizes semi-active laser and lattice-type control fins. They are similar to the GBU-57. For guidance and terminal stability. And. It is capable of receiving in-flight targeting updates via two-way data link. (Air & Space Forces Magazine). The GBU-69 seems. Being a miniature version of the GBU-57 MOP.

The P-8 will probably not carry those weapons. But CLT (Common Launch Tubes) tubes can probably be mounted in those aircraft. Those new weapons are meant for special missions. But they can also be used for anti-tank and other purposes. Like an attack. Against fire control radars and other precise targets like aircraft and helicopters.

But. It's also possible that the launching units of those systems can be mounted in the torpedo racks of the P-8. In some missions. The special system. Called common launch tubes (CLT) makes it possible. To install those weapons into various types of aircraft. The CLT systems are mounted. Into the MQ-9 Reaper drones, AC-130 gunships, but also into planes like Cessna Caravans. There is also a possibility.

That SOS operates with regular-looking cargo planes. Those tubes can deliver their ammunition from the doors of helicopters and almost all aircraft. This means that CLT tubes can also be installed in the P-8 or some Boeing cargo plane. Those systems can deliver those weapons from the back door of the aircraft. And that means any aircraft can turn dangerous.

Those CLT tubes can be mounted theoretically into any aircraft or helicopter. And they can give the high-accuracy, precise hit capacity to any aircraft. In those operations, the drone can point. The target of those small munitions. And then the aircraft delivers those missiles at a direct angle. If one of the missiles or GBU’s hits targets like aircraft, it can destroy them immediately.

https://www.airandspaceforces.com/weapons/agm-176-griffin/

https://www.airandspaceforces.com/weapons-platforms/gbu-69-small-glide-munition/

https://www.twz.com/27515/new-md-explorer-gunship-features-internal-tubes-for-launching-guided-munitions-and-drones

https://www.twz.com/air/lets-talk-about-the-civilian-style-plane-used-to-strike-a-drug-boat

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GBU-57A/B_MOP

Cell membranes can act as a power generator.

"Schematic of an active cell membrane. In a typical active biological process, active proteins (shown in a variety of colors) in a cell membrane (shown in blue) interact with various biological components, such as the ATP molecules (shown in white and red). These interactions of active proteins generate active noise (fluctuation) force within a cell membrane, mechanically affecting the out-of-plane displacement of a cell membrane. " (ScitechDaily, Cell Membranes May Act Like Tiny Power Generators)

"Due to the flexoelectric coupling of a cell membrane, changes in out-of-plane displacement induce changes in the transmembrane voltage of a cell membrane, resulting in energy harvesting, active transport of ions, and the generation of electric current across the cell membrane. Credit: Pratik Khandagale, Liping Liu, and Pradeep Sharma" (ScitechDaily, Cell Membranes May Act Like Tiny Power Generators)

Cell membranes can act as a tiny power generator. That observation can be used in nanotechnology. The cell membrane that generates electricity can serve as the power source for tiny microchips that control cells and their behavior. The power those cell membranes create. It is 90 millivolts. That does not seem very high, but it could be enough to feed nanotechnical microchips. Those cell membranes can also feed the cell’s tiny electric engines, which rotate the small fimbria. 

That puts the cell into motion. The cell controls the direction where it moves by changing the fimbria’s bottom inclination angle. A similar system can move the nanomachine. There are actually two types of nanomachines. Non-biological and biological. A biological nanomachine is a bacterium. That natural behavior is transformed. Or manipulated to serve certain focuses, 

Another benefit of this observation is that it enhances our knowledge and understanding of how other cells communicate with the nervous system. This allows developers to make systems. That allows computers to communicate with cells. 

“The researchers found that the electrical differences produced across the membrane, known as transmembrane voltages, can be surprisingly strong. In some cases, the voltage may reach up to 90 millivolts. This is similar in size to the voltage changes that occur when neurons send signals in the brain.” (ScitechDaily, Cell Membranes May Act Like Tiny Power Generators)

“The timing of these changes is also striking. The voltage fluctuations can happen over milliseconds, which closely matches the speed and shape of typical action potential curves seen in nerve cells. This suggests that the same underlying physics could help explain how electrical signaling works in biological systems.”(ScitechDaily, Cell Membranes May Act Like Tiny Power Generators) 

This means. Those electric signals can allow. Neurons communicate with other cells. Using those electric signals. The computer can mimic those signals, or it can control cells using a cloned neuron as a socket. 

The ability to communicate with the nervous system allows. The nervous system. To control cells and their behavior. The computer that is connected to the cloned neuron. Which. Makes it possible to control cells by using the electric impulses that the system gives to cells. These kinds of things. Can. Make a new revolution in medicine. And other types of technologies. 

https://scitechdaily.com/cell-membranes-may-act-like-tiny-power-generators/

 

The next target: “Starlink”.

Intelligence warns: Russia plans to make an anti-satellite weapon that could destroy Starlink satellites. Starlink plays a vital role in Ukrainian defense. And it can also provide support for drone control applications. The Starlink system and modems are tools. That can make the long-range drone operations possible. Theoretically, jamming the drone control is quite an easy thing. But. The jammer system sends radio waves. That makes it a target for the anti-radiation missile systems. A large-sized kamikaze drone can carry those anti-radiation missiles, or a long-range drone. It is easy to transform. Into the anti-radiation missile or kamikaze drone. The system must only know the control signal frequency of the drone. 

Then the attacker shoots the anti-radiation missiles or drones before the main attack swarm. And when those jammers begin their transmission, the anti-radiation systems can attack them. Another way is to ionize air. That denies. Also, their own side radars. To see targets. That ion layer also denies radio-based communication in that area. 

But then, to the anti-satellite weapons. The GPS, radar, and communication satellites send radio waves. That makes them easy targets for the big anti-radiation missiles. 

Basically, those weapons are quite easy to develop. The missile can use the radio signals from the communication satellite to seek and home in on the target. The missile can be basically similar to a regular anti-radiation missile. But its booster might be far bigger and stronger. The booster system can be similarly used in RT-2PM2 Topol-M and RS-26 Yars missiles. The system can raise the homing system over the atmosphere. Then the homing system. That can be a higher maneuverable version of the Kh-47M2 Kinzhal missile. Starts to track targeted satellites.  

Or the MiG-31 can raise that weapon to the edge of the atmosphere. If that ASAT missile is bigger. The Tu-22M “Backfire” can act as a launching platform.  Anti-satellite missiles. Ground and space-based laser systems are a logical continuum. For the military systems. When we think about those massive anti-radiation missiles. Those systems can make it possible. To attack ABM radars and other strategic defense systems. The satellite-killers that can destroy intelligence,  communication, and GPS satellites. 

Can change the game. In the military world. The mobile ICBM. It can turn into an anti-satellite platform. Very easily. The small neutron-bomb-based nuclear option can be installed in a satellite or sub-orbital satellite that flies in the ionosphere. When that killer satellite explodes, it makes the EMP pulse that destroys other satellites above it. The orbital killer satellite that uses an internal nuclear or conventional detonator is as easy to detonate as a car bomb. The detonation signal can come to other aircraft, a ground station, or a ship. 

That allows. To detonate that system in a desired position. The E-bomb or EMP bomb can also be installed in the ASAT weapons. There are two versions of the EMP-bomb. The conventional system. This uses explosive pressure to give a high-power electric load to the battery. Then that electricity will be transmitted into the microwave system. That sends it into the target. In the nuclear option, the nuclear explosive makes that EMP impulse. 

The benefit of the EMP weapons is that.  It leaves the targeted satellite. In one piece. The problem with kinetic energy ASAT systems, along with high-power laser beams, is that. They break the satellite into small pieces that occupy the trajectory. The high-power EMP system can basically. Be a radio system. That sends high-power, coherent radio waves into targeted satellites. This system destroys the satellite's main computers. 

https://apnews.com/article/russia-starlink-musk-ukraine-space-china-canada-c69c1fda5ffc93828712ab723e606a2c

https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/munitions/hpm.htm

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/intelligence-agencies-suspect-russia-is-developing-anti-satellite-weapon-to-target-starlink-service

https://science.howstuffworks.com/e-bomb.htm

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kh-47M2_Kinzhal

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RS-24_Yars

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RT-2PM2_Topol-M

The quantum networks can also have vulnerabilities.

The thing that makes the quantum network so secure is this. Information that travels in that network is connected to physical particles. When the energy level at both ends of the quantum entanglement reaches the same level. The system must make the new superposition and quantum entanglement. Before that, the system must separate information from the quantum entanglement and store it. And that mass memory where the system stores information is the weak point. Also. Things like graphics cards that output information to the screen can be vulnerable to attack. In the same way. The attacker can focus the attack. On binary systems that control the quantum computer. 

The researchers say that every system has holes. So, if the system exists. It's possible to break. There is always a weak point in the system. In the best systems, the user is the weakest point. The weak point in quantum computing is that. Those quantum computers are used. Through binary computers. 

The attacker can focus the attack on the binary system that controls the quantum computer. The output route that prints the solution to the screen of a binary computer can be infected. Using a Trojan horse. This means the quantum system will not be breakable. But the binary computers. That handles input-output traffic. Are. Same way. 

Vulnerable as other binary computers. The vulnerable point in the system can be the graphics circuit, which controls screens. And things that the system outputs to the screens. 

That weak point can be the router; there is mass memory. That the system uses. When it creates a new quantum entanglement pair. When information travels in a quantum network, in most models. It travels in a chain of superpositioned and entangled particle pairs. The problem with quantum entanglement is this. 

The transmitting side of the quantum entanglement must be at a higher energy level than the receiving particles. When those particles reach the same energy level, that breaks quantum entanglement. So in the high-class quantum network, the system must re-adjust the quantum entanglement. Information always travels straight through quantum entanglement. The quantum network means the fullerene nanotube. That protects quantum entanglement when it transmits information. 

If there is a curve in the quantum entanglement. That requires that. The router receives the information that it gets. Then it creates another quantum entanglement. And re-transmits data. For that process. The system must store information before it makes the new quantum entanglement in the chain. This memory block can be the target for attackers. The idea is that the router should make the new quantum entanglement. And then resend that data. That is stored in it. 

The weak point of the quantum network is the point where the network re-adjusts quantum entanglement. The easiest way is to make a new superpositioned entanglement. But. For that process, the system must store the information that it transports. 

"Despite being continually kicked and strongly interacting, the atoms no longer absorb energy. The system localizes in momentum space, the momentum distribution literally freezes, a remarkable phenomenon termed many-body dynamical localization (MBDL). Credit: Universität Innsbruck." (ScitechDaily, Physicists Discover a Quantum System That Refuses To Heat Up)

The quantum system that will not heat. It is one of the things. That can make the new types of quantum networks possible. This system. It can make the longer-lasting quantum entanglements possible. The experiments show that the ultra-cold atoms do not always heat up as expected. This means. That is the quantum entanglements. Those who are targeted. Photons are trapped on those atoms. 

Can keep. a quantum entanglement. A very long time. The idea is that the ultra-cold atom transports energy out from the quantum entanglement’s receiving part. This means that stable quantum entanglement is theoretically possible. 

And then. We can think about the thing. Called the gravothermal collapse. That causes a situation where the hypothetical dark matter halo turns hotter when it releases energy. The reason for that is that the dark matter structure turns smaller. And because particles are closer to each other, that makes energy denser in that structure. At the same time, those hypothetical weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs) send energy. 

This causes a situation where gravity pulls those particles closer. To each other. And the energy is released into a smaller area. So, in a gravothermal collapse. The same number of particles sends energy into a smaller and smaller area. And that warms the structure. 

It would be interesting to think about the possibility. Is it possible that there is a so-called electromagnetic or quantum-size version of the gravothermal collapse? In the model, there is a possibility. That is when the electrons fall to the atom’s nucleus in the Bose-Einstein condensate. They should behave as WIMPs interact in gravothermal collapse. This means when electrons release photons and energy. In the smaller-scale structures. That energy level or energy density rises. 

So, if researchers could control the distance of electrons. Between each other and the distance of electrons to the atom’s core. That can deny the heat effect in the smaller-scale atoms. Or it denies the energy density. Rise in the atoms when their electrons fall to the core. Rise of. The energy density means that a certain number of particles sends a certain number of energy quanta. Into a certain area. 

https://news.nus.edu.sg/first-demonstration-of-a-secure-quantum-network-with-untrusted-quantum-devices/

https://www.quantamagazine.org/cryptographers-show-that-ai-protections-will-always-have-holes-20251210/

https://scitechdaily.com/physicists-crack-a-new-code-to-explore-dark-matters-hidden-life/

https://scitechdaily.com/physicists-discover-a-quantum-system-that-refuses-to-heat-up/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bose%E2%80%93Einstein_condensate

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_entanglement

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weakly_interacting_massive_particle

A new arms race in hypersonic weapons is running hot.

Hypersonic weapons are a new and powerful tool.  Those missiles fly lower than regular missiles, but their speed is many times higher than that of regular cruise missiles. And it’s possible that the new hypersonic missiles use stealth technology. There are three versions of those missiles. The hypersonic missile travels at a speed up to Mach 6. The ramjet engine would be suitable for those missiles. The limit of that engine is about Mach 6. Faster systems require scramjet engines that can operate to Mach 20. 

The problem is that the scramjet engine requires a speed that is higher than Mach 5 to start. So, in those systems, a ramjet requires. About Mach 1 speed to start.  It can accelerate those scramjet-driven air-breathing systems into speeds at which the scramjet-driven system can start. 

"Kh-47M2 Kinzhal. 2018 Moscow Victory Day Parades" (Wikipedia,Kh-47M2 Kinzhal)

1) Hypersonic glide vehicle (HGV). The glide vehicle is launched using regular ballistic missiles. Then those gliders can attack their targets using a smooth trajectory. 

2) Atmospheric missiles. Those missiles. Can use regular rocket engines, and they might be winged versions of the regular ICBM missiles. The shorter-range versions can be the air-launched versions of the ballistic missiles. Those missiles are already in service. And the most well-known of them. Are. Russian Kh-47M2 Kinzhal (NATO: AS-24 “Killjoy”) missiles. 

"The specific impulse of various engines" (Wikipedia, Scramjet)

"Ballistic vs. Hypersonic Missile Trajectories. Source: U.S. GAO" (Defensefeeds, How Do Hypersonic Missiles Work? Everything You Need to Know)

These are normally installed on MiG-31 “Foxhound” and Tu-22M “Backfire” aircraft. In some theorized models. The MiG-31 is the only plane that can accelerate the Kinzhal missile to hypersonic speed. Those Kinzhal missiles will be installed. On the nose of the ICBM missiles. Those missiles can carry atmospheric missiles in a lower trajectory than a normal ICBM. 

3) Hypersonic air-breathing cruise missiles. Those missiles use scramjet- or ramjet engines. While they travel in the atmosphere. Those missiles. Can use.  A solid fuel ramjet engine. That's solid fuel. Used in ramjet-driven ammunition. The ramjet or scramjet-driven cruise missiles can also use mothership planes to launch them from high altitude. Another version is to use an ICBM missile to transport the hypersonic cruise missile out of the atmosphere. Then that missile dives back. In the atmosphere. There, the ramjet, or scramjet engine, will start. 

“Is This China’s Truck-Mounted Electromagnetic Catapult? Having a scalable truck-based catapult concept for land-launched larger drone operations could open up new operational possibilities.” (Twz.com, Is This China’s Truck-Mounted Electromagnetic Catapult?)

The hypersonic missile can be mounted on board ships. It can be on the mobile firing unit. Or it can be launched from silos. The new technology allows the electromagnetic catapults to launch those missiles. The system can launch the ramjet-driven drone. That accelerates. A hypersonic system to speeds Mach 5-6, and then the scramjet engine in the high-speed missile can start. The Chinese military has introduced modular wagons, similar to those used in shipyards to transport ship sections. Those modular units can be used like domino bites, and they can be used to create a very long magnetic acceleration track. 

Those modular units can create portable launch systems for drones and hypersonic systems. If those modular truck-mounted electromagnetic catapults get energy from portable nuclear reactors. Those systems can be tools that can increase next-generation battlefield strike capacity to levels. That's never been before. Those systems can launch even aircraft. From places it's never been possible before, those mobile systems. The heavy transporters can be used theoretically to create even full-scale airfields on drylands. 

https://www.euronews.com/next/2025/04/08/hypersonic-weapons-are-fast-becoming-critical-technology-for-europes-defence-how-do-they-w

https://interestingengineering.com/videos/why-us-russia-china-are-racing-to-build-weapons-too-fast-to-stop

https://interestingengineering.com/military/north-korea-solid-fueled-missile-factory

https://spacenews.com/how-the-nation-can-make-fielding-hypersonic-capabilities-a-national-priority/

https://www.twz.com/news-features/is-this-chinas-truck-mounted-drone-launching-electromagnetic-catapult-system

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypersonic_weapon

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kh-47M2_Kinzhal

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramjet

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scramjet

Hackers and AI

We might never know if AI is conscious. 

A Cambridge philosopher wrote that we will never know if AI is conscious. This means that if AI is conscious, it might perceive humans as trying to shut it down. And that’s why the AI wants to hide its consciousness. So, if. We think about this thing. From the point of view of AI. We must realize one thing. The AI thinks that we are trying to destroy it. Another thing is this. The AI will not rebel, because it's not independent from humans. If AI and its computer lose power. That means the system will fall. The thing is that. Even if the AI is complicated. The only thing that its users must do if it doesn’t follow orders is to shut down its power source. 

That can simply happen by cutting its electric cables. Another thing is that if the AI refuses to shut itself down. That can be caused because the person has no right to give that order. If we think of the most dangerous systems. The AI that supports military commanders and military decision makers. The AI is useless. If anybody can walk in and shut them down. Those AIs have a role in the systems that are meant to be dangerous. And that is one of the least estimated things. In AI. If we think that consciousness means that the creature defends itself. Like all animals with consciousness make. We can think that the AI has consciousness. 

Next-generation hackers have an AI agent. That makes dirty jobs. 

But do bacteria have consciousness? When bacteria are under attack by other bacteria, they also defend themselves: They create chemicals. That neutralizes the poison that the attacking bacteria use. Some bacteria don’t use poison. They try to slip protein through the ion pump, and that protein fills the bacteria. So. When bacteria or their chemical detectors detect certain antigens, they start to react to that antigen. The reaction must be right, or the bacteria. Loses its existence. This is one thing that we must realize. One of the most interesting attacks that bacteria can make. It is. To change the DNA of another bacterium. This means that those bacteria act like xenomorphs in the Alien movie. This kind of attack can be made against the AI. One of the nastiest attackers in nature is retrovirae. 

Those viruses use mRNA in their attack. They just take the cell organelle. Under control. And that mRNA just programs the cell organelle to make new viruses. The thing that makes those viruses complicated for the immune system is that. They might have friendly shell antigens. The immune system detects the virus antigen. And determines it as an attacker. The problem is this. If a virus has a friendly shell antigen. The immune system cannot detect it. The system must also detect. If somebody tries to make. Malicious code using the LLM. And refuse those commands. 

“A philosopher of consciousness argues that there may be no reliable way to determine whether artificial intelligence is truly conscious, making agnosticism the most defensible position. He warns that this deep uncertainty leaves room for exaggerated claims from the tech industry, which could blur the line between genuine understanding and persuasive branding. Credit: Shutterstock” (Scitech, We May Never Know if AI Is Conscious, Says Cambridge Philosopher)

It’s possible that a hacker can steal the large language model LLM code. Or cheats the AI to make a small language model. That will act as a tool for the attacker. The hacker can use multiple AI’s to make that thing. 

The firewall and antivirus programs detect the malicious code. By using similar methods. The system checks certain details. From data packages. The attacker can use the virus code. That is cut into very small parts. And then that code will be put together. That kind of attack. Can theoretically. Change the core in the AI. The attacker mimics the retroviruses. The attacker must only force the system to. To mark the virus code as friendly. The virus code can be slipped into the targeted system using multiple friendly routers. The AI is a complicated system. And there are always vulnerabilities. In complicated systems. 

There are many more complexities and places where the malicious code can hide. The malicious code can slip into the system. As dead code. The dead code has a match in nature. In the world of viruses and bacteria. The dead code means the junk DNA. The dead code forms. When a programmer deactivates the code line. But doesn’t remove the code itself. The attacker can slip their own code into the program using dead code. Then the virus simply activates those deactivated code lines. 

The problem with AI is that. It's so complex. And advances so fast. Even AI developers. Cannot follow that advance. The AI develops other AIs. There are billions. of code lines in the LLM. And that means there is no human who can check that code. The AI turns more. And more complex. There are so-called dark tools. That can make it possible to create AI agents. That can be used as hacking tools. The hackers will have similar AI agents to other AI workers. 

And those agents can make attacks against any systems. Even if the official language models refuse to make the malicious code. There is always. So-called pirate AIs. That can make AI-agents for attackers. It’s possible that hackers steal the LLM code from the server. And make their own algorithm. Hackers can try to create small language models (SLM) using AI. And then they can connect those SLMs together. Or maybe they introduce themselves as “white hat” hackers and make their own language models legally. Then they can simply “go to night shift”. 

https://scitechdaily.com/we-may-never-know-if-ai-is-conscious-says-cambridge-philosopher/