EMP and how to protect systems against it.

Can the stealth technology protect systems against some EMP pulses? The answer is no. Or it depends on. The power of the EMP. If stealth. It can make those electromagnetic waves slide over the structure without. Inducting electricity into the structure. It can protect electronics. But if the EMP can slip into the structure. The Stealth is useless. 

All EMP systems. They are not nuclear-based. If technology can deny the EMP from reaching the microchips. It could deny their destruction. But even if a low-voltage surge. It can destroy the programming of the microchips. 

There are plans to use extremely high-power radio systems. To create the EMP fields to protect targets against the stealth fighters. The system uses impulse capacitors to create an EMP that can damage a stealth fighter’s electronics. The system uses a Marx-generator-based EMP system. That gives an EMP impulses as a series of pulses. There is suspicion that the former Duga radar (”The Soviet Woodpecker). It is also used for EMP tests. Also, there were suspicions that Duga was planned to be used as a jammer. Or the Loran type navigation system for Russian bombers. 

Duga station entered service in 1976. The Duga station was supposed to shut down after the “Chernobyl” nuclear disaster. But it continued its service until December 1989. 

The Duga system. It was one of the most powerful radio transmitters in history. The system could be used in many types of tests. The EMP role, and the role as the transmitter of the subliminal infra-sound-based propaganda, or psychological operations. It is possible, but purely hypothetical. There is almost certainty that the Soviet military and the KGB conducted this type of research. But did they use the Duga radar for that purpose? That is a different thing. 

The question in this case is. About things like whether the EMP can reach the targeted electronics. Things like. The Faraday cage. And. Optical-fiber-based technologies. Can protect the  systems more effectively. The optical fiber-based technology means that the computer microchips are inside the Faraday cage. The Faraday cage is helpless. If the EMP travels in the cage from the electric wires. The EMP protection. It must be made by using systems that disconnect the wires. When they see a nuclear explosion. The flash of the explosion activates the switch. That disconnects the system. 

"A 400-kilometre-high (250 mi; 1,300,000 ft) EMP: gamma rays hit the atmosphere between 20–40 km (66,000–131,000 ft) altitude, ejecting electrons, which are then deflected sideways by Earth's magnetic field, over a large area. Because of the curvature and downward tilt of Earth's magnetic field over the US, the maximum EMP occurs south of the detonation and the minimum occurs to the north." (Wikipedia, Nuclear electromagnetic pulse9

“A Faraday cage or Faraday shield is an enclosure used to block some electromagnetic fields. A Faraday shield may be formed by a continuous covering of conductive material, or in the case of a Faraday cage, by a mesh of such materials. Faraday cages are named after the scientist Michael Faraday, who first constructed one in 1836.” (Wikipedia, Faraday cage)

The problem is this. The EMP can be made by making a surge into the wire. This means that the system. It doesn’t send a light flash in every case.  The capacitor-based EMP doesn’t require the explosives. The NNEMP (Non-Nuclear EMP) can be the next-generation tool for the military.  It can shut down electronics. Just before the commando strikes. The NNEMP system. That. Uses coherent radio waves (Radio masers) can also send the EMP pulses through the Faraday cage. The system must aim the radio waves through the holes of the metal net. Another way is to use a drone that shoots an electric wire through the EMP protector. When the EMP system sends an impulse. That electric wire conducts the EMP pulse into the EMP-protected room.  

And information travels between those microchips in optical fibers. That makes the system more immune to the EMP. The key question in EMP protection is this. Can the EMP affect electronics? Or can it touch electronics? The problem with traditional computers is their wires. The EMP inducts. A high voltage in those wires. And that damages microchips. The Faraday cage can protect computers. 

Only if the cage is fully separated from the outer space. Any wire or antenna that crosses the cage transfers the EMP into the cage. The reason why those EMP pulses are so hard for defenders is that. They have such a large-scale wavelength. That. Making a jammer against those systems is very  hard. To make. The jammer should cover all the wavelengths. That the EMP involves. And its power must be very strong. There is theoretical research. About things like counter-EMP. But the problem is that the nuclear-based EMP is so strong. And the EMP. That turns incoming EMP away must be launched precisely at the right moment. The problem is that the EMP is a radio wave. That scatters from every direction. 

The problem with the EMP pulse is that it destroys microchips very effectively. The protective system. It can be based on the idea that the computer is in a Faraday cage. The sensor system communicates with it wirelessly by using laser communication. Another way is to offer the EMP pulse a route past the sensitive electronics. The system can use the superconducting wires. That offers the route to the electromagnetic field. The wire itself is in the Faraday cage, which means it will not send electromagnetic radiation into its environment. 

If that kind of system can be made. It can also conduct the radar impulses away from the transmitter. The idea is that the system forces the radio waves to travel in the desired direction. The best way to protect buildings against the EMP is to enclose them in a Faraday cage. The metal cage. That surrounds. The house can protect electronics against the EMP. The sensors and the internet. It can work by using laser communication or optical fibers through the walls. 

If EMP destroys the sensor or router. The crew can take a new one outside. But that requires. That the house be completely surrounded by the Faraday cage. The system must also use power sources that are inside the house. One single wire. That which is not protected can conduct the EMP inside the protective cage.   But there is always a possibility that a drone lands on the roof of the house. Drills a hole in the roof. And drops the electric antenna inside it. Then the system can conduct the EMP pulse into the house. 

https://science.howstuffworks.com/e-bomb3.htm

https://passive-components.eu/capacitors-to-generate-high-voltage-pulses-with-marx-generators/

https://www.slideserve.com/colby/electromagnetic-pulse-emp

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duga_radar

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_pulse

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faraday_cage

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_electromagnetic_pulse

The AI passed Turing test.

The AI passed the Turing test. And that means: AI becomes more human than human. The Turing test measures today can AI generate answers that are impossible. To separate from humans. The Turing test, originally called the imitation game by Alan Turing in 1949, is a test of a machine's ability to exhibit intelligent behaviour equivalent to that of a human. In the test, a human evaluator judges a text transcript of a natural-language conversation between a human and a machine. The evaluator tries to identify the machine, and the machine passes. If the evaluator cannot reliably. “ (Wikipedia, Turing test). 

“To tell them apart. The results would not depend on the machine's ability to answer questions correctly. Only on how closely its answers resembled. Those of a human. Since the Turing test is a test of indistinguishability in performance capacity, the verbal version generalizes naturally to all of human performance capacity. Verbal. As well as nonverbal (robotic). (Wikipedia, Turing test). 

The ability to create AI that products cannot be separated from humans means new challenges for people. Whose mission is to control things like the thesis. The ability to create. This kind of AI that imitates humans perfectly makes it possible to use them to play humans. The AI agent that operates with workers can imitate real people. And that makes them very good tools for observations. The director can sit at the laptop and control AI agents that are virtual characters on the screen. Maybe in the future, the directors and team leaders can use the AI agents to follow the workers. 

Those AI agents can calculate how many times an hour the person takes breaks. Same way. Like in encoding work. The operator can operate virtual members of the workgroups. In the same way. The coder can operate virtual encoders. The director can operate virtual characters. The virtual character is actually an algorithm. That can act like a human. The virtual character can drop things and write notes. And many other things. In a virtual room that does not even exist in the real world. In that world, the office, the people whom you see. And things that you hear can be only virtual characters. Those characters can seem to make computer code in a nice office. But that office and the people who work there can be only algorithms. 

(Live Science) 

"The "standard interpretation" of the Turing test, in which player C, the interrogator, is given the task of trying to determine which player – A or B – is a computer and which is a human. The interrogator is limited to using the responses to written questions to make the determination." (Wikipedia, Turing Test)

The operators can use virtual characters to teach or train the AI. In that model, the AI creates the avatar. The virtual character, or digital twin. If we want to make a digital twin of certain people. That thing requires lots of data. But if we want to make and train a virtual character. That communicates with us. Only in the workplace. That thing requires less information. The virtual character who communicates with people. Only about work doesn’t require. A lot of training. And if the virtual character sees that somebody says something, that is outside the work. The order can be. “Back to topics. Time is money”. That allows. Controllers to avoid. The discussions that can uncover the virtual character. 

The AI agent can be a tool. That can collect information from the people. The AI agent can control tools like screen capture programs. The AI agent. With a very good dictionary. And very good articulation can be a good tool for social hacking. The virtual assistant. It can translate English into any language in the world. The virtual character. The algorithm can render. The performance and speech fit the desired character. 

That makes it possible to play any public person in the world. The AI agent must only see how the character speaks and acts. So, that kind of character can help to play even the presidents on screens. In those cases, the person who uses that kind of virtual actor can even use presidential authorities. And in the worst case, those virtual characters can cheat the micro support to create passwords with the same privileges. That president uses. The virtual character could pass the image recognition system. And that is the next-generation tool for identity thieves. 

Even if I just wrote that the digital twin. Made. To represent. A certain human. Or even a family member, requires lots of private data. But if the AI gets that data from somewhere. It is possible to create a virtual character. That can play. Even a family member. When we think about the work that this kind of thing requires. 

We must remember that every family has things. They talk with other family members. But if researchers. Or intelligence officers want to create. The digital twin of a public person. There is a lot of public data. About those kinds of persons. It’s possible that the agents got passwords for the Iranian digital infrastructure. Just before the U.S and Israel attacked Iran. Used some kind of digital actors. Like the Iranian leader’s digital twin as a social hacking tool. It’s possible that the agents. Used even Ali Khamenei’s digital twin to ask for passwords. Into that digital infrastructure. 

https://neurosciencenews.com/ai-passes-turing-test-30733/

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-future-brain/202605/ai-officially-passes-the-turing-test-landmark-study-shows

https://www.livescience.com/technology/artificial-intelligence/open-ai-gpt-4-5-is-the-first-ai-model-to-pass-an-authentic-turing-test-scientists-say

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turing_test